• GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    You formulated it as though you were bringing up something new: “you mean the same X who Y” is for introducing something new into the conversation in relation to X, with X here being Jill Stein. If you had just used David Duke as X and “who lead the KKK” as Y, it wouldn’t have been an absurd contribution.

    Though it would still be a silly one, since people know who David Duke is, it’s not some obscure fact. He’s the single most recognizable name in connection with the KKK, perhaps along with the long-dead D.W. Griffith (but probably not).

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Didn’t formulate it any way, that’s you assuming.

      Also assuming everyone knows who David Duke is. The general public isn’t clued in on KKK facts. I’m sensing a pattern.

      • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Didn’t formulate it any way, that’s you assuming.

        That’s me reading English. What I was referring to is a set phrase, but it’s not a fossilization, it’s still just what the words mean if you’re actively putting them together. God, this is such an annoying, pointless argument.

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I agree, this is pretty pointless over something very pedantic and meaningless. And lets see who spun up this " annoying, pointless argument"… Hrm…

          Oh yea, the guy assuming that David Duke is a household name and that’s their stance on why I’m misguided. When most Americans couldn’t name every state your stance is they def know the former leader of the KKK.