For decades, we have been in the streets in defense of the Palestinian people, and will continue to fight until the total liberation of Palestine!

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is great, and I completely agree with you, and on November 5th I’m going to cast a ballot for Kamala Harris because Trump will be worse. You should, too.

    • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You should be against genocide and vote against genociders. Harris is literally part of the administration doing this genocide and has been an active supporter of its strategies. She has been very clear in her support of Israel during genocide, as has nearly the entirety of the “lesser evil” (genocidal) Democratic Party.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Then run some downticket races. Write your congresspeople. Join some protests or boycotts. And at the ballot, vote your conscience.

        It’s Trump or Harris. You can choose one, or you can choose neither, but one of those two people will win the election. Do you think it doesn’t matter who wins?

        • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          As you ignored what I said, let me repeat.

          You should be against genocide and vote against genociders. Harris is literally part of the administration doing this genocide and has been an active supporter of its strategies. She has been very clear in her support of Israel during genocide, as has nearly the entirety of the “lesser evil” (genocidal) Democratic Party.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do you care about stopping fascism? Then you must study its history, and come to the understanding that it can only be opposed by socialist organizing.

      Go join a socialist org. Vote for whoever you want to but don’t pretend like voting for Kamala Harris will stop the crisis.

      To oppose fascism with conviction, you have to build up a socialist project.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Right, but you’re making my point for me. You can’t build up a socialist project by running a third party presidential campaign. You need a grassroots movement, with local politicians, ideological outreach, volunteer organizations, and voter evangelism.

        It’s like we’ve built a house, and we’re painting the ceilings, and someone asks you which paint you like, and you say that you don’t like the location of the house. You might be right, but that’s not the decision we’re faced with right now. Your choices are matte ceiling white and human feces. “Relocate the house, because this is a bad spot for a house,” you say. Well, that’s not going to happen, so white or shit? “Move the house. Everybody, let’s all vote to move the house.” No. You can have an opinion on the ceiling color, or you can fuck off, but there is a clear choice to be made. If you fuck off, your ceiling may be painted with human shit, and if you don’t think that matters enough to have an opinion, I don’t know what to tell you.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It is more like they’re building more concentration camps and we are voting whether there should be a “in this house” lawnsign out front of each one.

          At some point you have to realize that voting within capitalist psuedo-democracy will not get you the results you want, if you care about stopping the construction of the concentration camps.

          At some point, you have to realize that the working class is only going to save itself from encroaching fascism by banding together, and not by voting between candidates that will never be allowed to represent our interests.

          I’m sympathetic to the idea that Kamala Harris will be better in some ways than Trump, but I dont care enough to really bother examining all sides of the argument, because fascism is a structural issue that will not be resolved through sham elections where people only get options approved by the Capitalist class.

          The capitalist class will lead us to fascism if they are not stopped. That is the long and short of it.

          If you care about stopping fascism- if you’re willing to put blood sweat and tears into preventing it from happening in the US- you have to join a socialist org and work towards defeating capitalism. Our oppressors will not grant us freedom through their ballot box.

      • SassyRamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Anyone speak Russian? I’d like to adress Dimitri here in his mother tongue. Kamala is the answer go home and fuck your vodka bottle.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree with them that Palestinians should be free, that Israel should stop the genocide, that America should stop supporting the genocide. And I agree that Donald Trump would be the worst possible candidate to put in charge of the executive branch of the US government.

        I only disagree with two points. First, I do not agree that Kamala Harris is the same as Donald Trump, not on any issue. Second, I do not agree that voting for a nonviable third party in a national election will have any effect on Democrats or their policies.

        I agree with de la Cruz on more issues than I do with Harris. Healthcare, taxation, military spending, reparations, Indigenous sovereignty… Pretty much everything except those two points, so I’m voting for Harris because she’s better than Trump.

        • boywar3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m personally more partial to “I’m sorry I won’t sacrifice my trans friends’ lives to make myself feel morally superior,” but yours works too haha

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Trans woman here, stop using the genocide happening against us to wipe your hands of the genocide happening in Gaza

            • boywar3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Your opinion is noted, but I’ve heard the reverse of that statement from trans people as well, so…no? Trans people are not a monolith and you do not speak for all of them any more than I speak for all white 20-something dudes.

              • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Your opinion is noted, but I’ve heard the reverse of that statement from trans people as well, so…no?

                So maybe you should stop treating trans people like a monolith and develop correct opinions like, “genocide is unacceptable and I should work against it”.

                This is why parent is correct and you are not.

                Trans people are not a mono

                The irony

                and you do not speak for all of them any more than I speak for all white 20-something dudes.

                Hey look a 20-sometging white dude that excuses the genocide of brown people. What a unique and uncommon development.

                • boywar3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Your idea of working against genocide is…torpedoing other positive changes in people’s lives by not participating in harm reduction? Interesting choice

                  • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Your idea of working against genocide is…torpedoing other positive changes in people’s lives by not participating in harm reduction?

                    I’ve said nothing remotely like that. Though your attempt to characterize neoliberal genociders as harm reduction is noted.

                    I do actual work with and for trans people. Tangible things. Not sitting around being flippant about my support for genocide. That’s your sin to mull over. Maybe you will forgive yourself some day.

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Cool, so you want to use trans genocide to justify your position, and you’ll listen to the trans people who agree with you but not to trans people to disagree with you.

                This is good ally behavior /s

                Don’t give a shit who you vote for but if you want to actually stop fascism you have to go join a socialist org. Liberals are structurally incapable of stopping fascism, as fascism is capitalism in decay and liberals support capitalism as their number 1 priority.

                • boywar3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  In a situation where I am being told to do 2 conflicting things that are effectively mutually exclusive, yes, I will pick the person I know’s wishes over some random stranger.

                  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Don’t give a shit who you vote for but if you want to actually stop fascism you have to go join a socialist org. Liberals are structurally incapable of stopping fascism, as fascism is capitalism in decay and liberals support capitalism as their number 1 priority.

                    Is this mutually exclusive with your friend’s statement?

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            But you will sacrifice palestinians to make yourself feel morally superior, of course, and eventually all of us when the duopoly fails to adequately address Climate Change and/or provokes World War 3, as they seem to be doing.

            • boywar3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I’m not going to claim to be morally superior - I am making a pragmatic choice about the people I care about. But more to the point, you are actively delusional if you think the left at this stage has any hope of breaking the duopoly and making all these big changes and stopping genocide.

              “No you don’t get it - we just need a few more people and the duopoly is finished!” What are you, 12? If we want to effect actual change, organize on a local level and start flipping seats in state legislatures, representatives in the house, etc.

              It’s ludicrous to believe anywhere near a majority can occur when you have exactly fuck all for a track record to back it up, and that’s not even talking of how impossible it would be for any leftist executive to do anything in a largely conservative government with checks and balances.

              Use your brain and think about how best to achieve your goals: a vote for the mildly more left candidate today (the one that will at least continue democracy and not gun down leftists) has a much better chance for the future than letting the Right win. If you think “if the right wins and things get bad enough, the worker revolution will be upon us!” then you’re even more delusional than I thought. Accelerationist nonsense like that will just make things worse for the climate and accomplish little, as there is still no way the American public would ever go for a leftist revolution (much less win it).

              So tell me, what’s your plan besides cry about Kamala online and yell at people for making the pragmatic choice?

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                So you do not pragmatically care about Palestinians, got it.

                “No you don’t get it - we just need a few more people and the duopoly is finished!” What are you, 12? If we want to effect actual change, organize on a local level and start flipping seats in state legislatures, representatives in the house, etc.

                Utter fantasy to believe that this is possible.

                Use your brain and think about how best to achieve your goals: a vote for the mildly more left candidate today

                Only ones are Stein and De La Crúz.

                has a much better chance for the future than letting the Right win

                You’re voting for the right, lmao.

                If you think “if the right wins and things get bad enough, the worker revolution will be upon us!” then you’re even more delusional than I thought.

                I don’t, you’re the one voting for genocide and continuous right wing slides.

                So tell me, what’s your plan besides cry about Kamala online and yell at people for making the pragmatic choice?

                I simply will not support genocide, and will advocate others to organize and join leftist orgs, rather than continuing to goosestep with the DNC and GOP as they thrust the world into chaos. You’d actually vote for Hitler if 101% Hitler was running against him, and you would shame Leftists for not “siding with the left leaning candidate.” Hilarious.

                • boywar3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  So you think it is impossible for the left in the US to win then, got it.

                  Stein is a moron going for the top of the heap without any support whatsoever and only serves as a spoiler to let the right win.

                  The Dems are slightly left, so I will vote for the best option available.

                  So you don’t believe the left has a chance of flipping local seats and building support, but also want people to join leftist orgs for…reasons?

                  What’s the plan for when Republicans strip more worker protections, finish off Palestine, and make being in a union illegal to please their corporate masters?

                  Your plan of “I simply won’t support genocide” does at least as much as me voting for Kamala, that is to say, relatively little. You “not supporting” something doesn’t stop it from happening lol

                  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    So you think it is impossible for the left in the US to win then, got it.

                    Electorally, yes.

                    Stein is a moron going for the top of the heap without any support whatsoever and only serves as a spoiler to let the right win.

                    The right wins if the Dems or Reps win.

                    The Dems are slightly left, so I will vote for the best option available.

                    The Dems are right-wing, increasingly so over time.

                    So you don’t believe the left has a chance of flipping local seats and building support, but also want people to join leftist orgs for…reasons?

                    The electoral system is designed to prevent leftist change. Winning minor, local seats is not only ridiculously difficult, but upon gaining support the DNC and GOP collaborates against leftists, like what happened in GA and PA with PSL. Joining an org is so that leftists can build up dual power outsids the electoral system, revolution is the only way to avoid climate disaster and world war 3.

                    What’s the plan for when Republicans strip more worker protections, finish off Palestine, and make being in a union illegal to please their corporate masters?

                    The same as when Democrats strip more worker protections, finish off Palestine, and make being in a union illegal to please their corporate masters. Encourage people to join leftist orgs like PSL, FRSO, and abandon the right-wing Democrats.

                    Your plan of “I simply won’t support genocide” does at least as much as me voting for Kamala, that is to say, relatively little. You “not supporting” something doesn’t stop it from happening lol

                    You supporting something certainly helps it happen.

                    Is there a line that the Dems could cross for you to abandon them? As the US gets more fascist due to Capitalist decay, which is accelerating, is there a jumping off point? Or will you stand in line with the US Empire the whole way?

                  • sweetpotato@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    The dems are not slightly left, they are right wingers, just not far right. You are voting for the right wing, for the billionaires, the weapon manufacturers, the oligarchs.

                    You don’t seem willing to listen to a counterargument, but just in case, you might need to consider where you would put your red line for the lesser evil party. Cause there is necessarily for everyone a red line beyond which both parties would be indistinguishable (think of Hitler and the other party being again Hitler but if he funded the healthcare system a little more - these two alternatives gotta be universally indistinguishable). And since we established that, you should probably realize that for a lot of people that red line has been crossed long ago.

          • kropotkin@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I was talking to a girl in beyruth. She was concerned about her parents. She wanted to flee to jordan, but the planes are full. Here’s the exchange.

            hat's what I heard, these a-holes are putting warning that an area was gonna get bombed and then they bomb another place.
            
            Do you know where to go? You have family abroad?
            (...)
            9:56 CEST
            Bonjour
            9:57 CEST
            Yes and they are using phosphorous!!
            9:57 CEST
            I was thinking of going to a relative of mine in Jordan
            9:58 CEST
            My mom and dad refuse to leave
            9:58 CEST
            Sadly they say that they would rather die in Lebanon
            9:59 CEST
            It is heartbreaking to see my parents, who are so old, witness yet another war!!
            
            • boywar3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yep. That sucks. Doesn’t change that I’m voting for Kamala.

              I’d rather her be in charge than Donald “Finish the Job” Trump.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          So you don’t actually agree with them regarding Palestinian lives, you agree with Harris. Simply saying “ideas sound good” doesn’t mean you agree with them, even if you think they would be better. If your actions prevent ideas you think were good, like cessation of Palestinian genocide, then you don’t actually support said ideas.

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m not sure how I can be more clear. I disagree with Harris on most issues. I will vote for Harris because Trump would be much worse.

            There are no actions available to me that will end the Palestinian genocide.

            • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              There are no actions available to me that will end the Palestinian genocide.

              1. You are currently complicit in the genocide by advocating for genociders and normalizing genocide as just another “lesser evil” policy plsnk.

              2. You and I both know you haven’t even tried to find anything to do. If you had, you would have found it easily and would be listing it for credit. You can join socialist groups such as PSL (though they would not take you until you became more educated) or FRSO. You could help the ANSWER Coalition or other groups present at protests. You could promote BDS programs that turn up the pressure on Israel. You could dedicate your time to opposing genocide apologetics. You could normalize support for the axis of resistance. There is a reason Kamala named Iran as the her idea if the biggest adversary, they are the state that is most strongly opposing this genocide. You could raise money for direct assistance to Palestinians (not NGOs) so they better survive.

              Stop making excuses.

              • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                See, the cool thing about this is you already know everything about me, what organizations I have joined and support, what political and civil programs I participate in, so it’s extremely easy for me to recognize that you’re simply a liar. If you were just wrong, we could continue to debate, but you’ve chosen to deliberately misrepresent who I am, which means I can ignore anything else you say because you’ve proven to be dishonest.

                • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  See, the cool thing about this is you already know everything about me

                  It is a common tsctic of deflection to exaggerate a perceived opponent’s claims so that you can talk about the exaggeration instead of what was actually said.

                  I know some things about you based on your behavior. Not everything. And the things said I knew? You have not contradicted them.

                  what organizations I have joined and support

                  Certainly none that support Palestine and oppose the genocide because they would kick you out for these sentiments. See how I know things?

                  what political and civil programs I participate in

                  This is just repeating yourself.

                  so it’s extremely easy for me to recognize that you’re simply a liar.

                  Tell me about your great organizing for Palestine and against this genocide, O Kamala Harris genocide vote shamer.

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Okay so you’re not willing to do anything unless you, through your personal actions, can stop an entire genocide? Or are you trying to make a different point?

        • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I agree with them that Palestinians should be free, that Israel should stop the genocide, that America should stop supporting the genocide. And I agree that Donald Trump would be the worst

          You would like to believe this in theory but clearly do not really think so. Otherwise, you would not be telling everyone to support the genocidal Biden-Harris administration.

          And I agree that Donald Trump would be the worst possible candidate to put in charge of the executive branch of the US government.

          We’ve had a Trump presidency and he didn’t start any genocides. The main genocide he continued was Obama’s targeting Yemen, but Trump deescalated it by comparison. We don’t need hypotheticals, we already know that, in action, your cabdidates are more bloodthirsty war criminals.

          Though the entire premise is flawed. Maybe you should take a step back and ask what you are contributing to by normalizing genocide. By, instead of helping organize resistance, you are trying to sheepdog people back into the fold so they vote for genociders. Look at yourself in a mirror and reoeat those words.

          I only disagree with two points. First, I do not agree that Kamala Harris is the same as Donald Trump, not on any issue.

          Kamala Harris rarely takes any stances of her own, mostly just taking on others’ talking points. She then reverses course any old time with no consequences aside from the fact that nobody can name a single thing they like about her, There is nothing there to directly grasp onto rhetorically. You can have nothing to say about her policy positions with any confidence outside if her track record of tailing power and courting the right. California’s top cop just announced she would put a Republican in her cabinet, Lmao. Aren’t Republicans an existential threat, per your team-based logic?

          But in action, we know she is lockstep with the Biden admin and the DNC was a dystopian nightmare of JOYOUS celebration of genociders (thank you Joe!) and Israel, though I repeat myself.

          Second, I do not agree that voting for a nonviable third party in a national election will have any effect on Democrats or their policies.

          Democrats have routinely courted the votes of people that otherwise refuse to vote for them based on specific issues. This does not mean that they will actually respond to every demand, but your belief is ahistorical. Have you not notice Dems moving right? They’re trying to peel off Republican voters. Do you know why they do that? Do you know how their strategists think of their “left”, such as it is? They know that they could gain votes from Republicans and think they already have your vote locked down. What are you going to do, vote third party? This little piece of illogic works on you to disempower yourself. They don’t have to do anything except vilify their opponent and you do the rest of the work!

          You need to develop discipline if you are to do anything good electorally, let alone stop excusing genocide.

          I agree with de la Cruz on more issues than I do with Harris. Healthcare, taxation, military spending, reparations, Indigenous sovereignty… Pretty much everything except those two points, so I’m voting for Harris because she’s better than Trump.

          Is a candidate better when they can get away with genocide without your opposition? Y’all went straight to sleep after Biden was elected and are now excusing genocide.

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            A candidate is better when they are on enough of the ballots to win the election. Claudia is not. She does not have any conceivable path to 270. She literally cannot win. Casting a vote for her is saying you don’t care who actually wins. I actually care.

            • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              First, just want to note that you ignored basically everything I said. If you can’t actually engage with what I say, you can always just not write a comment at all.

              A candidate is better when they are on enough of the ballots to win the election. Claudia is not.

              I challenged you to think about the harm created by normalization. You can’t help but try and slot it into “but my genocidet can win the election” logic. Do you not see the disconnect?

              She does not have any conceivable path to 270. She literally cannot win.

              Yes everyone is aware of this, you are just catching up.

              Casting a vote for her is saying you don’t care who actually wins.

              First, did you already forget how the electoral college works? It’s not like your vote is actually for Harris and will help her win in most states. But you loudly announcing support for a genocider does have impact.

              Voting third party in this situation, as in most, says, "neither major candidate is acceptable to me. You are pretending this means a lack of investment in outcomes, but it actually means having a realistic idea of how you can begin to forward political interests rather than being a sheepdog for genocidal empire.

              Again, your “strategy” is to cheerlead genociders. And of course it isn’t your strategy, it’s the same PR group-tested vote shaming strategy that has led to Democrats being able to openly do genocide while knowing they won’t lose your vote. Your “strategy” is why we are here.

    • chobeat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      why? how? how do you rationalize this when the Biden administration is openly endorsing and supporting genocide? How could Trump make it worse? Write racist slurs on the bombs sent to Israel?

      • finestnothing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        PSL isn’t going to win no matter what (even if they won every state they’re on the ballot in, they can’t reach 270). Trump says “You’ve got to finish the problem” regarding Gaza aka wipe out Gaza, while Biden/Harris/Walz support Israel defending itself within its borders but don’t support genocide. Is the democrat position as good as it could be? No. Is Trump’s position far worse? Yes.

        • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          while Biden/Harris/Walz support Israel defending itself within its borders but don’t support genocide.

          This needs to be a joke. Is Gaza part of Israel now?

        • chobeat@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          everything that has happened so far has happened under a dem administration. 40+k deaths and endless displaced. Stop being delusional, dems are genocidal and you’re guilty too.

          • finestnothing@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            So… Your solution is to increase the chance that we elect a guy that not very subtly hinted at letting Israel kill everyone in Gaza, on top of all the rights Trump wants to take away for people in the US? I don’t like the democrat party and they do a lot wrong, but they’re still a hell of a lot better than Republicans.

            Anyone voting for the PSL party this election is just voting for Trump.

            • chobeat@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              That’s exactly how eventually you are going to get Trump. Voting the lesser evil always, inevitably leads to the major evil. I live in a country that already elected fascists with this same logic and US is going to follow soon.

            • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              So… Your solution is to increase the chance that we elect a guy that not very subtly hinted at letting Israel kill everyone in Gaza

              Biden is already actually doing this. Biden is already materially supplying the necessary means for this genocide, in weapons, logistics, diplomatic support, PR pushes. And Kamala has been perfectly in line with him the entire time.

              Aside from this, your lesser evil logic is inherently self-defeating and us why you are always trying to split hairs in which war criminal to cheer on rather than actually opposing them. A competent electoralist would priorituze building leverage (withholding votes while making demands) and consciousness (so that number is large enough to matter). Instead, you are repeating what those in power tell you to say, for their own benefit.

              But how much time do we really need to spend on bad strategy when you openly support genociders, and therefore, the genocide they are carrying out? Democratic voters are not hard-nosed strategists building power for their causes, making reluctant compromises. They vote based on personal morals and propaganda campaigns.

              Believe it or not, your personal morals should include fighting against genocide, not for its perpetrators.

              I don’t like the democrat party and they do a lot wrong, but they’re still a hell of a lot better than Republicans.

              You like it enough to go to bat forvit while it carries out genocide. Spare us the feigned reluctance.

              Anyone voting for the PSL party this election is just voting for Trump.

              This is a good example of why you should engage critically with what your masters handle down to you as talking points. By this sane logic (not voting for a major party’s candidate) a vote for PSL is a vote for Harris so don’t worry it all balances out.

              But of course, that isn’t actually how electoralism works. Electoral power, such as it is, does not emerge from your personal “reluctant” vote for genocide. Nor does it emerge from repeating the logic that it you just support the lesser evil team, it will all work out, just wait around for the needed change. Electoral piwer emerges from leverage, from having material consequences for not meeting demands, and the only real material consequence in an election is that you lose.

              It is a moral and strategic imperative that the genocidal Biden-Harris administration lose this election and that it is clear they list due to supporting genocide.

              It is up to you whether you want to contribute to that moral and strategic imperative or throw your vote into the historical pile of supporters of oppression. Whether you will fight for liberation or be MLK’s white moderate.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Write racist slurs on the bombs sent to Israel?

        Liberals literally believe this, that’s why they keep talking about that one Nazi who signed a bomb sent to Gaza.

    • teagrrl@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Gotta love the vote shaming liberals, I only wish they were ashamed for voting for genocide.

      Genocide Extreme™ Party or Genocide Party? At the end of the day it is still genocide and you should be ashamed that genocide isn’t a red line for you. If you’ll vote for genocide, what won’t you vote for? You’re basically telling the democrat party “I will vote for you as long as you make me feel morally superior to republicans regardless of what your actual policies are. And if you feel like changing those policies later on to further align with republicans, I’m cool with that too.”